HCS HB 835, 90, 707, 373, 641, 510, 516 & 572 -- OMNIBUS CRIME BILL SPONSOR: Hosmer (Britt) COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Criminal Law by a vote of 11 to 0. This substitute enacts various changes pertaining to criminal law. In its main provisions, the substitute: (1) Allows county commissions to create county crime reduction funds and specifies the purposes for which the money in the funds can be spent. The substitute allows the court to order restorative justice methods in cases where there is a suspended imposition or execution of sentence and to order individuals who have a suspended imposition or execution of sentence for a misdemeanor to make a payment of up to $1,000 to the county crime reduction fund (Sections 50.550, 50.555, and 558.019, RSMo); (2) Requires itinerant vendors and peddlers to show receipts to law enforcement officers for new and unused property being sold. "New and unused property" is defined as property that has not been used and is still in its original packaging (Sections 150.465 and 570.010); (3) Makes changes to the crime of institutional vandalism. Currently, if damages are less than $1,000, institutional vandalism is considered a class A misdemeanor; if damages are more than $1,000, it is a class D felony; and if damages are more than $5,000, it is a class C felony. The substitute revises the penalties as follows: if damages are less than $500, institutional vandalism is a class A misdemeanor; if damages are more than $500, it is a class D felony; and if damages are more than $10,000, it is a class C felony. In addition, if damages are more than $100,000, incarceration of 7 years without probation or parole is required. In all cases of institutional vandalism, the offender must pay restitution for damages to property. The substitute also gives the right of civil action for damages or losses to owners of property adjacent to cemeteries and to caretakers of abandoned family cemeteries. Currently, only those who incur bodily injury or damage to personal property have a right to civil relief (Sections 214.131, 537.523, and 574.085); (4) Allows minimum terms for parole eligibility for offenders with consecutive life sentences to exceed the minimum term for parole eligibility for an ordinary life sentence (Section 217.690); (5) Establishes minimum periods of incarceration for operating a vehicle or motorcycle upon any state highway without a valid driver's license. The minimums are 48 hours for a first conviction, 10 days for a second conviction, 30 days for a third conviction, and one year for a fourth or subsequent conviction. Currently, the crime is a class A misdemeanor for a first or second conviction, which is punishable with either a $1,000 fine or one year's imprisonment. For 3 or more convictions, the crime is a class D felony, which is punishable with up to 5 year's imprisonment or a fine of $5,000. These sentences will remain in effect in conjunction with the new incarceration requirement. The substitute also changes the penalty for driving with a revoked license. The substitute eliminates the provision that allows persons in violation to avoid imprisonment if community service is a condition of parole or probation. As a result, driving with a revoked license is punishable with a minimum of 48 hours of incarceration for a first conviction, 10 days for a second conviction, 30 days for a third conviction, and a minimum of one year for 4 or more convictions (Sections 302.020 and 302.321); (6) Requires that persons convicted of stealing for leaving without paying for motor fuel, in addition to any other criminal penalties imposed, have their drivers' licenses suspended. The suspensions will be imposed as follows: 60 days, with hardship license eligibility after the first 30 days, for a first violation; 90 days, with hardship license eligibility after the first 30 days, for a second violation; 180 days, with hardship license eligibility after the first 90 days, for the third violation or any subsequent violations (Section 302.286); (7) Creates the crime of theft of services, which is a class C felony if the value of the services is $750 or more and a class A misdemeanor for services less than $750. An offender commits the crime if he or she contracts with a transportation of property provider and, after the property has been delivered, fails to make payment on the contract. Intent to avoid payment may be presumed if the offender does not make the required payment in the time specified or does not make payment within 30 days if no time was specified (Section 407.308); (8) Permits law enforcement officials to detain a person for 32 hours without charging a crime if the person has been arrested for first degree assault or robbery, forcible rape or sodomy, or distribution or manufacture of drugs. Currently, a person who is arrested for these offenses must be released within 20 hours unless charged with a crime (Section 544.170); (9) Creates a commission on the death penalty, which is created to study all aspects of the death penalty in Missouri. The substitute designates the members of the commission and directs it to hold public hearings. The commission's findings, which must include recommendations for corrective amendments to the statutes and court rules, are to be available to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Supreme Court by January 1, 2004 (Section 565.042); (10) Prohibits human cloning or attempted human cloning. The substitute makes human cloning a felony punishable by imprisonment for no more than 10 years and a fine of no more than $10 million (Section 565.310); (11) Allows to be admissible as evidence of intent to steal the possession, use, transfer, or reproduction of a sales receipt, tag, or universal price code (Section 570.030); (12) Makes stealing a class A misdemeanor if the property or services are worth less than $425 and a class C felony if the value is $425 or more. Currently, stealing is a class A misdemeanor for property valued less than $750 and a class C felony for property worth $750 or more (Section 570.030); (13) Makes receiving stolen property a class A misdemeanor if the property is valued at less than $150 and a class D felony if it is worth at least $150 but not more than $425. The substitute makes receiving stolen property a class C felony if the property is valued at $425 or more or if the person receiving the property is a dealer in goods of the type in question. Currently, receiving stolen property worth less than $150 is a class A misdemeanor and a class C felony for property worth $150 or more (Section 570.080); (14) Expands the definition of forgery to include the making of receipts and universal product codes and the knowing use or transfer of forged receipts and universal product codes (Section 570.090); (15) Makes several changes to the crime of passing bad checks. The substitute allows the prosecuting attorney to charge, in addition to any other costs and fees, an administrative handling cost of $25 per bad check. If the bad check is for $100 or more, an additional fee of 10% of the check may be assessed, not to exceed $50. Currently, prosecutors may recover administrative handling costs of $5 for checks less than $10; $10 for checks of $10, but less than $100; and $25 for checks of $100 or more. The substitute also requires the prosecutor to collect from the issuer of a bad check a reasonable service charge to turn over to the recipient of the bad check. Currently, this is a discretionary duty. If a check is dishonored but not referred to the prosecutor, the substitute allows the recipient to collect from the issuer the face amount of the check, a reasonable service charge not to exceed $30, and an amount equal to the charge by the bank for the return of each check (Section 570.120). FISCAL NOTE: Estimated Net Cost to General Revenue Fund of $1,248,869 to Unknown in FY 2002, $2,660,360 to Unknown in FY 2003, and $4,517,589 to Unknown in FY 2004. Cost to Highway Fund of $6,000 in FY 2002, and $0 in FY 2003 and FY 2004. Estimated Net Effect to State School Moneys Fund of $0 in FY 2002, FY 2003, and FY 2004. PROPONENTS: Supporters of HB 835 (county crime reduction fund) say that this legislation is necessary to allow the creation of crime reduction funds in certain counties. These funds already existed in certain counties but were struck down by a court decision that cited the need for specific legislative authority, which this legislation would give. Supporters also indicate that several problems that existed in past versions of this legislation, such as those cited in the Governor's veto of SB 335 (1999), have been remedied in the current version. Supporters of HB 90 (driving with revoked license) say that 20% of all fatal accidents nationally, and 8.8% statewide, are caused by persons with revoked licenses, suspended licenses, or no licenses, therefore showing the need for stiffer penalties. Supporters of HB 707 (parole eligibility for persons with multiple life sentences) say that persons who have committed the types of violent crimes that would subject them to multiple life sentences should not be eligible for parole until all of the years necessary for minimum parole eligibility in each of their sentences have been consecutively served. Supporters of HB 373 (motor fuel theft) say that statistics show recent increases in gas thefts. Supporters believe that the current penalties are not enough incentive for prosecutors to bring these cases, and that license revocation would be a greater deterrent. Supporters of HB 641 (32-hour holding period) say that Missouri's standard holding period is the shortest in the nation and needs to be increased since it does not provide the time necessary to secure indictments in many cases. Supporters cite the dangers involved in releasing and re-arresting suspects when the existing holding period does not provide enough time to run the testing necessary for an indictment. Supporters also state that suspects still have rights of redress if they were held longer than necessary or if they were held without probable cause, and that this legislation cannot impact those constitutionally-based rights. Supporters of HB 510 (institutional/cemetery vandalism) say that cemetery caretakers currently cannot file civil actions against vandals, thus their ability to prevent vandalism and to remedy past vandalism would be enhanced if they were given this ability. In addition, supporters state the need for stronger criminal penalties for deterrence and prosecution purposes. Supporters of HB 516 (stealing, passing bad checks) say that new protections are necessary to stop the increasing trade in, and use of, counterfeited bar codes, and that Missouri's stealing penalties need to be updated and made uniform. Supporters of HB 572 (passing bad checks) say that it would standardize the charges by merchants on bad checks and would give greater incentives for prosecutors to proceed in cases against passers of bad checks. Testifying for the bill were Representatives Britt (HB 835), Ross (HB 90), Barnett (HB 707), Crump (HB 373), Jolly (HB 641), Overschmidt (HB 510), Griesheimer (HB 510), Richardson (HB 516), and Dolan (HB 572); Missouri Sheriffs Association (HB 835); Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association (HB 373); Casey's General Stores (HB 373); Kansas City Police Department (HB 641); Missouri Police Chiefs Association (HB 641); Missouri State Fraternal Order of Police (HB 641); Kansas City Police Officers Association (HB 641); Missouri Prosecutors Association (HB 641); and Missouri Retailers Association (HB's 516, 572). OPPONENTS: Those who oppose HB 641 say that the bill may impinge on suspects' civil rights and that the increased hold time gives greater opportunities for coerced police confessions or admissions. Opponents also stated that the new provision allowing police officers to be prosecuted for violating the hold period is misleading, since no prosecutor would be likely to bring such a charge. Testifying against HB 641 was Missouri Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Greg Linhares, Legislative AnalystCopyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives