FIRST REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 918
91ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE HENDRICKSON.
Read 1st time March 5, 2001, and 1000 copies ordered printed.
TED WEDEL, Chief Clerk
AN ACT
To repeal section 546.260, RSMo 2000, relating to privileged communications, and to enact in lieu thereof one new section relating to the same subject.
Section A. Section 546.260, RSMo 2000, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as section 546.260, to read as follows:
546.260. 1. No person shall be incompetent to testify as a witness in any criminal cause or prosecution by reason of being the person on trial or examination, or by reason of being the husband or wife of the accused, but any such facts may be shown for the purpose of affecting the credibility of such witness; provided, that no person on trial or examination, nor wife or husband of such person, shall be required to testify, but any such person may testify at his or her option either on behalf of or against the [defendant] accused, and shall be liable to cross-examination, as to any matter referred to in his or her examination in chief, and may be contradicted and impeached as any other witness in the case; provided, that in no case shall husband or wife, when testifying under the provisions of this section, be permitted to disclose confidential communications had or made between them in the relation of such husband and wife.
2. Notwithstanding subsection 1 of this section or any other provision of law to the contrary, in any criminal prosecution [under] pursuant to chapter 565, 566 or 568, RSMo, involving an alleged victim under the age of eighteen, a spouse shall be a competent witness against a defendant spouse, and no spousal privilege as set forth in subsection 1 of this section or any other provision of law shall exist.
3. No person shall be incompetent to testify as a witness in any criminal cause or prosecution by reason of
being the parent or child of the accused, but any such facts may be shown for the purpose of affecting the
credibility of such witness; provided, that no parent or child of the accused shall be required to testify, but
any such person may testify at his or her option either on behalf of or against the accused, and shall be
liable to cross-examination, as to any matter referred to in his or her examination in chief, and may be
contradicted and impeached as any other witness in the case; provided, that in no case shall parent or child,
when testifying pursuant to the provisions of this section, be permitted to disclose confidential
communications had or made between them in the relation of such parent and child.