Summary of the Committee Version of the Bill

HCS HB 441 -- METHAMPHETAMINE PRECURSOR DRUGS

SPONSOR:  Behnen

COMMITTEE ACTION:  Voted "do pass" by the Committee on Crime
Prevention and Public Safety by a vote of 12 to 0.

This substitute creates several restrictions regarding the sale
of compounds containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine.  The
purchase of products containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine,
other than those in liquid or gel capsule form, is limited to
nine grams of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine per month.  Current
law limits only the amount of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine that
can be purchased at one time.

Compounds containing these drugs may be sold only by pharmacies.
The pharmacy must keep a log of all sales, keep all of these
products behind a counter where the public is not permitted, and
demand photo identification from the purchaser proving he or she
is at least 18 years of age.  All records of these sales will be
open for inspection by law enforcement officials.

These restrictions do not apply to compounds that are in a liquid
or gel capsule form.  In addition, the Department of Health and
Senior Services may, by rule, grant exemptions for any drug that
the department finds is not used in the illegal manufacture of
methamphetamine or other controlled substances.

A violation of these provisions is a class A misdemeanor.

The substitute contains an emergency clause.

FISCAL NOTE:  Estimated Cost on General Revenue Fund of Unknown
less than $100,000 in FY 2006, FY 2007, and FY 2008.  No impact
on Other State Funds in FY 2006, FY 2007, and FY 2008.

PROPONENTS:  Supporters say that past legislative efforts to
limit the sale of pseudoephedrine have failed.  Missouri still
leads the nation in methamphetamine labs, with more than 2,800
lab incidents in 2004.  The State Highway Patrol logged 19,000
overtime hours working on meth cases last year; and in most
cases, local law enforcement agencies are also involved.  The
Jefferson County Sheriff's Office spent $524,000 last year
battling meth production.  Meth producers put the lives of their
children in danger from meth fumes, fires, and explosions of
their meth labs.  Meth task force members must wear hazardous
material gear when cleaning up lab sites because the chemicals
used are so dangerous.  The average meth lab costs more than
$3,000 to clean up.  When Oklahoma enacted similar legislation,
meth lab incidents dropped 80%, while the figures rose in
Missouri.  The meth producers could not get pseudoephedrine in
Oklahoma, so many of them moved their operations to Missouri.
Ten states in the Midwest are considering similar legislation.
States which do not enact legislation will soon see how fast meth
production can spread.  The bill exempts all products that are in
liquid and gel cap drugs, because the meth producers can't make
meth out of those compounds so the consumers will still have a
multitude of cold remedy choices.  The legislation in Oklahoma
did not affect  prices or the availability of cold remedies for
consumers.  The only people affected were the meth producers.

Testifying for the bill were Representatives Behnen, Goodman,
Lipke, and Wagner; State Highway Patrol; Franklin County
Sheriff's Office; Missouri State Troopers Association; Jefferson
County Sheriff's Office; Cape Girardeau County Sheriff's Office;
Missouri Police Chiefs' Association; Kansas City Police
Department; St. Louis County Police Department; Office of the
Attorney General; Missouri Petroleum Marketers and Convenience
Store Association; Missouri Sheriffs Association; Department of
Health and Senior Services, Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous
Drugs; Missouri Pharmacy Association; and Barbara Barnes Miller.

OPPONENTS:  There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Richard Smreker, Senior Legislative Analyst

Copyright (c) Missouri House of Representatives

redbar
Missouri House of Representatives
93rd General Assembly, 1st Regular Session
Last Updated August 25, 2005 at 1:19 pm